Photo taken on July 3, 2025 shows the US Capitol building in Washington, DC, the United States. [Photo/Xinhua]
The US State Department recently released its annual human rights report, once again focusing its scrutiny on China. This article aims to dissect the claims within the report, the context surrounding these allegations, and the broader implications for international human rights dialogue.
Disconnection from Reality
The report has been criticized for lacking grounding in factual reality. Many observers argue that it serves more as a geopolitical tool than an objective assessment of human rights conditions in China. Such reports often reflect a double standard, wherein the US uses human rights rhetoric as a weapon against nations that do not align with its strategic interests. In doing so, the US interferes in what many believe are the internal affairs of sovereign nations.
China’s Approach to Human Rights
In response, Chinese authorities have emphasized their commitment to a “people-centered” approach to development. This philosophy prioritizes improving the living standards of China’s 1.4 billion citizens. Rather than emulating a Western model of human rights, China has charted a unique path that correlates with its cultural values and national priorities. This has garnered recognition from various international observers, who see China’s approach as a valid alternative within the global human rights dialogue.
Developments in Xinjiang
The situation in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region is a focal point of controversy. Proponents of the Chinese government argue that people of various ethnic backgrounds enjoy their legal rights and benefit from socioeconomic development. Xinjiang has reportedly become a vital hub for tourism and international trade, highlighting progress made in the region. More than 200 million tourists visit annually, and the region plays a crucial role in the Belt and Road Initiative, linking China to Europe through the China-Europe Railway Express.
Progress in Other Regions
Similar narratives of development and human rights progress are echoed in the Xizang Autonomous Region and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The implementation of “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong has been cited as a significant achievement. These successes challenge the narrative of widespread human rights violations in China and illustrate that development can occur alongside evolving political structures.
A Call for Dialogue
While China is open to discussions surrounding human rights, it staunchly opposes external interference. The Chinese government maintains that no nation has the authority to impose its values or standards under the pretext of human rights. This reluctance for outside input stems from a broader desire for autonomy in addressing internal matters and promoting national interests.
The Double Standards of the US
Before criticizing other countries, it is essential for the US to address its domestic human rights issues. Reports revealing inequality and systemic flaws illustrate a troubling landscape in which wealth disparity continues to widen. The opioid crisis, rooted in corporate interests and government collusion, is exacerbated by a lack of regulatory oversight. Recent statistics revealed over 40,000 fatalities due to gun violence in the United States, highlighting a pressing need for reforms.
Global Impact of US Policies
The repercussions of US human rights violations extend beyond its borders. While the US administration focuses on alleged abuses in China, it seems oblivious to its role in the humanitarian crises unfolding in regions like Gaza. Additionally, the US’s imposition of unilateral sanctions particularly affects vulnerable economies, with over 60% of low-income countries facing financial penalties. These actions underscore the idea that human rights have been weaponized in international relations.
Conclusion: The Distortion of Human Rights
In summary, the annual human rights report by the US State Department raises questions about its authenticity and intent. The politicization of human rights has transformed these ideals into bargaining chips in global power dynamics. As the US grapples with its structural dilemmas, it becomes imperative for all nations to articulate their positions on human rights within a framework of mutual respect and understanding, rather than as a means of exerting control.