The 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the European Union (EU) and China should have been an occasion filled with celebration, reflection, and a shared vision for the future. This milestone was expected to foster dialogue during the 25th EU-China summit, a platform designed to showcase the importance and depth of this longstanding relationship. However, what unfolded was far from a jubilant celebration.
A Shrinking Summit
Originally scheduled for two days, the summit was reduced to a single day on July 24 in Beijing, featuring meetings between Chinese President Xi Jinping, Premier Li Qiang, European Council President Antonio Costa, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The decision to condense this event reflects the escalating tensions and complexities in EU-China relations. The absence of a joint summit communiqué—a standard diplomatic practice—marked a notable departure from what would typically signify the successful conclusion of such meetings.
Midlife Crisis in EU-China Relations
The current state of EU-China relations is often characterized as experiencing a midlife crisis. Historically, these ties have never been characterized by warmth; rather, they’ve been built on a foundation of necessity. Despite significant ideological differences, both parties sought collaboration for geopolitical and strategic reasons. This relationship was seen as vital for maintaining multilateralism and a multipolar world.
The diminishing warmth between the two sides can be attributed to various factors, including differing values, disputes over human rights, trade tensions, and a general disillusionment with each other’s intentions. Recent developments reveal that these ongoing issues have led to an atmosphere where constructive dialogue is increasingly difficult.
Symbolism and Protocol in Chinese Diplomacy
China’s diplomatic ethos has long appreciated the importance of symbolism and protocol. The scaled-back summit occurred after a series of meetings among Chinese diplomats that aimed to project a controlled and carefully crafted narrative. These meetings were intended to showcase China’s willingness to engage with European leaders, yet they lacked significant outcomes. Events like the strategic dialogue between foreign ministers and high-level climate discussions demonstrated attempts to maintain connections, albeit without substantial results.
Face-Saving and Damage Control
The 25th EU-China summit ultimately served more as a face-saving event for China and a mechanism for damage control for the EU. European leaders voiced a litany of grievances and expectations, yet without offering concrete solutions. The EU has publicly reiterated its commitment to engage with China, indicating it continues to value this relationship. However, the summit resembled a couples’ therapy session, raising concerns about whether both parties can effectively communicate their needs and work towards mutual objectives.
Conclusion: The Path Forward
As the EU and China move forward from this anniversary, the challenges facing their relationship remain substantial. The need for open and constructive communication is crucial if both sides are to establish a more balanced and mutually beneficial partnership. The history shared over the past half-century offers valuable lessons; however, the road ahead demands courage, compromise, and an honest assessment of core issues.
In a world increasingly characterized by division and uncertainty, the EU and China must find ways to navigate their differences. A commitment to dialogue, respect for shared interests, and recognition of each other’s values will be pivotal in redefining this relationship. Only then can the EU-China partnership evolve beyond necessity and lay the groundwork for a genuine and sustainable collaboration in the years to come.